Policy feedback effects on public opinion: a list of quantitative studies

Feb 21, 2021

In my article in the Policy Studies Journal (published in 2019), I provided a review of published quantitative studies that explicitly examine policy feedback effects on public opinion.

Since then, I have noticed several other studies being published and below I provide a list of the studies I have in my archive. As you can read in my article, I introduced several criteria for the selection of studies of interest (for example, I only look at studies using individual-level data).

As I have not been meticulously following the literature over the recent years, I am sure the list is not exhaustive. I plan to update the list when I find additional studies and do feel free to reach out if you are aware of studies that I have missed.

StudyContextPolicyOutcome
Abou-Chadi and Finnigan (2019)29 countriesSame-sex rightsAttitudes toward homosexuality
Anderson (2009)16/17 countriesLabour market policiesSocial ties
Andersson et al. (2018)SwedenAsylum applicationsAttitudes towards refugees
Anzia et al. (2022)U.S.Farm aid programsView on farm aid programs and government
Banducci et al. (2016)28 countriesFamily policyGovernment policy attitudes
Barabas (2009)U.S.Private investment account programSupport for privatization policies
Barnes and Hope (2017)U.S.Means-tested public assistancePolitical socialization
Beaudonnet (2015)27 countriesWelfare efficacySupport for the European Union
Bendz (2015)SwedenPrivatization reformAttitudes toward health care privatization
Bendz (2017)SwedenPrivatization optionAttitudes toward health care privatization
Branham (2018)U.S.Policy spendingPolicy support
Breznau (2017)19 countriesSocial spending and decommodificationGovernment responsibility
Bruch et al. (2010)U.S.Government assistancePolitical engagement
Bruch and Soss (2018)U.S.School experiencesPolitical engagement and government trust
Burlacu et al. (2018)Germany and SwedenWaiting time rightsHealth system satisfaction
Busemeyer (2013)20 countriesPrivate share in education fundingAttitudes toward redistribution
Busemeyer and Goerres (2014)20 countriesEducationPolitical participation
Busemeyer and Goerres (2020)GermanyPublic childcare feesFair fee level
Busemeyer and Iversen (2014)20 countriesPublic share of education spendingAttitudes toward government spending on education
Busemeyer and Iversen (2020)20 OECD countriesPrivate welfare provisionSupport for the welfare state
Busemeyer and Neimanns (2017)21 countriesChildcare and unemployment benefitsGovernment responsibility
Chattopadhyay (2017)U.S.Dependent coverage provisionPolicy support and political engagement
Córdova and Kras (2020)BrazilWomen’s police stationsTrust in the police
Davenport (2015)U.S.Policy-induced riskPolitical participation
Dellmuth and Chalmers (2018)13 EU member statesEU spendingSupport for the EU
Ellingsæter et al. (2017)NorwayChildcare service reformsChildcare service attitudes
Fernandez and Jaime-Castillo (2013)27 European countriesPension policy attitudes (e.g. generosity)Attitudes toward increasing contributions to the pension system
Fervers (2019)GermanyLabour market reformVote intention
Flavin and Griffin (2009)U.S.MultiplePolicy preferences
Flavin and Hartney (2015)U.S.Bargaining lawsPolitical participation
Fleming (2014)U.S.School voucher programMultiple
Garritzmann (2015)17 countriesEducation expendituresAttitudes towards student support
Gingrich (2014)16 countriesTax design and welfare visibilityRight-wing party vote
Gingrich (2019)BritainEducation policyEconomic equality attitudes
Gingrich and Ansell (2012)18 countriesEmployment protection legislation and single payer systemGovernment spending attitudes
Guo and Ting (2015)ChinaSocial insurance coveragePolitical participation
Gusmano et al. (2002)U.S.Health care policiesAttitudes toward employer involvement in health care
Haselswerdt (2017)U.S.Medicaid beneficiaryPolitical participation
Haselswerdt and Bartels (2015)U.S.Tax expenditure policy toolApproval of social programs
Hedegaard (2014)DenmarkProximity to welfare recipientSocial policy preferences
Hedegaard and Larsen (2014)DenmarkProximity to welfare recipientSocial policy preferences
Hern (2017a)ZambiaPolicy accessPolitical participation
Hern (2017b)ZambiaGovernment project accessPolitical participation
Hetling et al. (2008)U.S.Welfare reformAttitudes toward welfare recipients
Im and Meng (2016)ChinaMultiple welfare policiesAttitudes toward government responsibility
Jacobs and Mettler (2018)U.S.Access to health careAffordable Care Act attitudes
Jordan (2010)11 countriesHierarchical health care systemAttitudes toward government responsibility
Jordan (2013)17 countriesWelfare policy generosityGovernment responsibility for welfare
Kerner (2020)8 countriesPension systemAttitudes towards neoliberalism
Kotsadam and Jakobsson (2011)Sweden and NorwayProstitution lawAttitudes toward prostitution
Kreitzer et al. (2014)Iowa (U.S.)Same-sex marriage legalizingSupport for same-sex marriage
Kumlin (2011)11 countriesSocial policy generositySatisfaction with democracy
Kumlin (2014)SwedenWelfare policy informationPerformance evaluation
Kumlin and Rothstein (2005)SwedenNeeds-tested policiesInterpersonal trust
Kweon (2018)18 European countriesLabor market policiesVote choice
Larsen (2018)DenmarkRetrenchment reformGovernment support
Larsen (2020)30 countriesHealthcare policiesGovernment attitudes
Lavery (2014)U.S.Policy information designPolitical knowledge and engagement
Lavery (2017)U.S.Policy informationPolitical engagement
Lerman and McCabe (2017)U.S.Public insuranceSupport for health care policies
Li and Wu (2018)ChinaPension schemePolitical trust
Lindh (2015)17 countriesPrivate funding and public employmentSupport for market distribution of services
Lü (2014)ChinaPolicy benefitAttitudes toward government responsibility and trust in government
Lynch and Myrskylä (2009)11 European countriesPublic pensionsAttitudes toward pension reforms
MacLean (2011)AfricaPublic schools and clinicsPolitical participation
Maltby (2017)U.S.Jail ratioPolitical attitudes and participation
Mettler (2002)U.S.Educational benefitsPolitical participation
Mettler and Stonecash (2008)U.S.Means-tested programsPolitical participation
Mettler and Welch (2004)U.S.Educational benefitsPolitical participation
Munoz et al. (2014SpainAusterity packagePolitical engagement
Nagayoshi and Hjerm (2015)26 countriesLabour market policiesAnti-immigration attitudes
Ofosu et al. (2019)U.S.Same-sex rightsAntigay bias
Pacheco (2013)U.S.Smoking legislationAttitudes toward smoking and smokers
Raven et al. (2011)NetherlandsWelfare state spendingPreferences for social security spending
Rhodes (2014)U.S.Education policiesPolitical engagement
Rosenthal (2019)U.S.Universal and means-tested policiesPolitical participation
Rönnerstrand and Oskarson (2020)SwedenWaiting-time guaranteeHospital service satisfaction
Sances and Clinton (2021)U.S.Expansion of MedicaidSupport towards the Affordable Care Act
Schneider and Jacoby (2003)U.S.Public assistanceMultiple
Shore (2014)26 countriesSocial benefitsPolitical engagement
Simonovits et al. (2019)U.S.Agricultural paymentsElectoral participation
Soss (1999)U.S.Social policies (AFDC and SSDI)Political engagement
Soss and Schram (2007)U.S.Welfare reform (TANF)Multiple
Stensöta and Bendz (2020)SwedenEarly retirement generosityPolicy trust
Sumino (2016)19 countriesShare of taxes in household incomeSupport for taxation
Svallfors (2010)GermanyPolicy regimeAttitudes towards government responsibilities
Swartz et al. (2009)U.S.Social policy assistancePolitical engagement
Theiss and Kurowska (2019)9 European countriesSocial welfare benefitsProtest behaviour
Vannoni (2019)Four countriesTobacco advertisement bansTobacco control attitudes
van Oorschot and Meuleman (2014)23 countriesUnemployment policiesPerception of deservingness of the unemployed
Watson (2015)U.K.Conditional benefits recipientPolitical engagement
Weaver and Lerman (2010)U.S.Contact with the authoritiesPolitical engagement and political trust
Yang and Shen (2021)ChinaSocial welfare benefitsPolitical trust
Zhu and Lipsmeyer (2015)19 countriesPrivatization of healthcare responsibilitySupport for increasing government healthcare spending
Ziller and Helbling (2017)21 countriesAntidiscrimination lawsPublic administration evaluation, political trust and democratic satisfaction
Erik Gahner Larsen
RSS
https://erikgahner.github.io/posts/feed.xml